The video that I watched, the ASPCA states openly that it's going to cost a lot of money for this breeder to get his dogs bac. Even though they probably don't have the animals in their custody yet, and have no way of knowing the vet history, they state that "the dogs don't get vet care, will need vaccinations, it's going to cost a lot of money, but we have to..." It makes me wonder if they intend to spay and neuter the dogs as well. And if they will legally be able to do that. The dogs were not awarded to the custody of the ASPCA, as the judge said the breeder could get the dogs back after building new shelters, if they are built in 21 days(I think). I hope that this is true, I hope that they don't attempt to make costs so prohibitive that he is unable to afford to retrieve the dogs.
The breeder was ticketed with failure to provide adequate shelter, as well. We'll have to wait to see the outcome to that. I hope that he has someone check the temperatures in those barrel dog houses, and is able to prove that they are, indeed, acceptable shelter.
As far as I have read, though, this is not a clear cut victory for the animal rights side of things. Depending on the terms actually agreed to, if he builds shelter to their specifications, and pays the boarding fees, he should get all of the dogs back. Unaltered. I hope that he had the exact specifications for the shelters are included in the agreement signed. I hope that he has people turn out to assist him, and lend their hands to build these shelters as quickly as possible.
I know that many breeders are upset with the verdict and think that it is a loss for us. Am I upset about this verdict? Yes, I am. But I do not view it as a loss. How this breeder deals with this situation will say a LOT about how things go forward. I hope that he follows through on his end of things, and that the ASPCA follows through with their end of the agreement. I know that breeders everywhere have their eyes glued to this case.
This should serve as a wake up call to all breeders - know your county's regulations, and at the very least, meet the minimum. If possible(and reasonable), exceed the minimum - some places it is easier than others, as some places are more reasonable than others. Ask for a copy in print, and keep it in your files. Remember that it is your right to ask for proof of position and a search warrant before allowing anyone onto your property. If you find yourself in this situation, have everything documented in your agreement, every angle, every possible outcome, all the specifications for everything.
Updated : I found another news report, which states that about 40 dogs were taken - including 6 puppies who were living in the house. Seventeen dogs were left behind, on the promise they will be coming in "when the temperature gets too cold". This report does clearly state that the dogs will be returned, provided he improves shelter. It also seems preferable that the dogs go back where they came from, as they were cared for there, it was just that the shelter was deemed inadequate.
I'd love to know if anyone has taken heat readings in those barrels around the dogs. I am anxious to hear the updates of what happens in the end, on the 21st, when he is able to either get the dogs back or not. I wish I could go and help this breeder get his shelters built, or donate to help him pay fees. Sadly, I can do neither, but I hope that those who can, are.
Research Links
There really isn't much research available. I'm surprised that there were not more articles available, however using multiple search terms brought up nothing.
CBS Albany News
Times Union Blog Post - Contains supposed police write up
Examiner Blog Post
For all those just joining me, I now have a facebook fan page. Please, like it, show your support or your lack thereof, but keep it clean - no cussing, no insults - to people on BOTH sides of the fence.
Herds Not Hoards, The Fan Page